“To the left, ‘Clintonism’ implies accommodation and calculation. But to the right in 1992, it meant usurpation”

Author Date

Few current observers seem to recall the wrath that greeted Bill Clinton’s ascension. To the left, “Clintonism” implies accommodation and calculation. But to the right in 1992, it meant usurpation. Reaganism held almost religious significance, and its reign was supposed to be transformative and permanent. For the One True Way to be restored, Clintonism had to be delegitimized.

That delegitimization ushered in the politics of party restoration at whatever cost, governance and country be damned. This led first to an attempted legislative coup in 1998 and then to a judicial coup in 2000. And to all the more recent outrages of birtherism, government shutdowns, delayed Supreme Court confirmations and, ultimately, the rise of a would-be autocrat as a party nominee.

Susan Faludi, “How Hillary Clinton Met Satan”, The New York Times (30 October 2016), SR5.

Related posts:

  1. “Cruz is the pinup for pessimistic times”
  2. “Somewhere in recent years, the GOP’s engagement with modern America…became dysfunctional”
  3. “One of the mysteries of 2016 is the degree to which Hillary Clinton is reviled”
  4. “A startling aspect of the rage that greeted Bill Clinton was how much of it was aimed at the women he entrusted — or tried to entrust — with power”