“Is it the responsibility of those who study a community to reinforce the choices of others to join that community?”

Author Date

I remain fascinated by and ambivalent of the ways in which American Jewish sociology – the study of the structure and functioning of Jewish society – is so often and explicitly tied into advocacy of certain types of functioning over others. … Is it the responsibility of those who study a community to reinforce the choices of others to join that community? In what ways does this become a “thumb on the scale” in doing the research, consciously or unconsciously?

Yehuda Kurtzer, Facebook post (5 February 2018) [https://www.facebook.com/yehuda.kurtzer/posts/10156237644402174]

Related posts:

  1. “In the formative years of women’s and gender studies in the field of rabbinics, inquiries into the Talmudic concept of gender took the shape of liberal feminist readings”
  2. “One should always be wary of a book by a scholar insisting that there is a pattern where before none has been seen…”
  3. “Epistemological insiderism not only stakes out certain domains as belonging to persons with certain identities; it also risks boxing persons with those identities into specific domains”
  4. “Unparallel parallels which feed a partisan ego scarcely represent good scholarship…”